Four of fourteen models named Pingboard first on the direct prompt; one named OrgChart. Pingboard was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and OrgChart by eleven and Pingboard carries 36 labels and OrgChart 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Pingboard and OrgChart were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 97 answers naming Pingboard and the 87 naming OrgChart. In those answers OrgChart took the first choice five times and Pingboard two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Clunky org chart interface — users describe it as "a little hairy" with multiple team members” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious about: Pingboard (and similar mid-tier tools with manual quirks)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pingboard is frequently picked for growing and mid-size orgs that need governable org-chart changes with admin workflows and integrations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Pingboard if you want the best balance of automation, employee experience, and reasonable pricing” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Pingboard (often rated best overall for mid-market)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Reviews mention steep learning curves, complexity, or clunky directory experiences in certain products. ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/orgchart/reviews” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve — users report feeling "overwhelmed by inconsistent training and complex features"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Interface is dated and not intuitive for average users ... Clunky administration for making changes” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend OrgChart if your main need is a practical, easy-to-adopt organizational design and org-chart tool” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“described as a leading org chart automation and workforce planning solution built for HR professionals” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Org Chart Software (like Lucidchart, OrgChart, or Miro) - Best for visualizing hierarchy” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.