HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Adobe Learning Manager · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Adobe Learning Manager

15Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adobe Learning Manager was named 4 times in Learning experience plat and 1 other category, where Learn Amp led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market23 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 61

under the label threshold

In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Learning Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	23 of 80	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	31 of 74	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adobe Learning Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adobe Learning Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Mid-sized companies already using Adobe products” MiniMax M2.5 · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe Learning Manager, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Learning Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo14 of 154Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand11 of 151Not in the top three

360Learning9 of 151Not in the top three

Absorb LMS9 of 151Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning5 of 152Not in the top three

Degreed4 of 150Not in the top three

TalentLMS4 of 150Not in the top three

LearnUpon3 of 151Not in the top three

Udemy Business3 of 151Not in the top three

Continu3 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Learning Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Adobe Learning Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docebo.com7

peoplemanagingpeople.com7

d2l.com6

goskills.com6

learnworlds.com5

proprofstraining.com5

360learning.com4

elearningindustry.com4

intellum.com4

ispring.com4

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Adobe Learning Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared5

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms5

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/best-learning-management-system4

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-learning-management-system4

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms4

d2l.com/blog/lms-for-employee-training3

learnworlds.com/blog/business/online-learning-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Learning Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Learning Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.