HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › ADP Global Payroll · September 2026 Edition

ADP Global · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

ADP Global Payroll

14Judge labels

2First choices

4Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ADP Global Payroll was named 5 times in Global payroll and 1 other category, where Deel led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business41 of 42

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 54

under the label threshold

In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ADP Global Payroll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	0%	27 of 66	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%
Payroll software	Core HR and payroll	0%	26 of 43	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ADP Global Payroll yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ADP Global Payroll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase5 labels2

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Global payroll / multiple countries: consider ADP Global Payroll” GPT-5.4 mini · Payroll software · direct prompt · alternative

“worth considering if you want a more traditional enterprise provider” GPT-5.4 mini · Global payroll · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Poor customer support, limited reporting, complex navigation, slow issue resolution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ADP Global Payroll, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP Global Payroll was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Deel11 of 142Not in the top three

Remote10 of 143Not in the top three

Papaya Global8 of 142Not in the top three

Rippling8 of 141Not in the top three

Oyster5 of 141Not in the top three

G-P5 of 140Not in the top three

Workday4 of 141Not in the top three

Gusto3 of 140Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM3 of 140Not in the top three

Safeguard Global3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP Global Payroll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named ADP Global Payroll and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

remote.com6

gartner.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

adp.comYour site4

cxcglobal.com4

eorhq.com4

g2.com4

globaleorservices.org4

selectsoftwarereviews.com4

teamed.global4

Forty of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming ADP Global Payroll came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employer-of-record-eor5

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-global-payroll-providers5

boundlesshq.com/blog/the-problem-with-employers-of-record3

cxcglobal.com/blog/payroll-regional-and-global/top-global-payroll-providers3

g2.com/products/adp-global-payroll/reviews3

whichpayroll.com/best-global-payroll3

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402404-best-global-payroll-software-20262

eorhq.com/compare/best-eor-for-small-business2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ADP Global Payroll

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP Global Payroll; a claim can dispute any of them.

ADP Global 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP Global Payroll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP Global Payroll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.