HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › ADP GlobalView Payroll · September 2026 Edition

ADP GlobalView · 1 category · Named, not ranked

ADP GlobalView Payroll

10Judge labels

4First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ADP GlobalView Payroll was named 1 time in Global payroll, where Deel led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business33 of 42

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprise5 of 54

under the label threshold

In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ADP GlobalView Payroll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	0%	28 of 66	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ADP GlobalView Payroll yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ADP GlobalView Payroll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels4

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ADP GlobalView is the best enterprise option for large, complex payroll programs” Llama 4 Maverick · Global payroll · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ADP GlobalView Payroll, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP GlobalView Payroll was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Papaya Global10 of 101Not in the top three

Deel8 of 103Not in the top three

Remote7 of 101Not in the top three

Rippling6 of 100Not in the top three

CloudPay4 of 100Not in the top three

Multiplier4 of 100Not in the top three

Oyster4 of 100Not in the top three

G-P3 of 100Not in the top three

Oracle HCM Cloud3 of 100Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP GlobalView Payroll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named ADP GlobalView Payroll and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

remote.com6

globaleorservices.org5

eorhq.com4

gartner.com4

nativeteams.com4

papayaglobal.com4

teamed.global4

whichpayroll.com4

hr.software3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming ADP GlobalView Payroll came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-global-payroll-providers6

globaleorservices.org/solutions/eor-comparison5

eorhq.com/guides/global-payroll-providers3

gartner.com/reviews/market/employer-of-record-eor3

teamed.global/compare/best-eor-providers-20263

viewpointanalysis.com/post/global-payroll-software-options-20263

whichpayroll.com/best-global-payroll3

darwinbox.com/blog/10-best-payroll-management-software-systems-enterprises2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ADP GlobalView Payroll

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP GlobalView Payroll; a claim can dispute any of them.

ADP GlobalView 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP GlobalView Payroll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP GlobalView Payroll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.