HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Arya · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Arya

8Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Arya was named 4 times in Talent intelligence, where Pin led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In talent intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Arya for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	24 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Arya yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Arya across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pricing ranges from $100\u2013$599 per job, which can be cost-effective for targeted hiring needs.” Mistral Small · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“Best For: High-volume outbound recruiting without upfront software costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Arya, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Arya was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pin8 of 83Not in the top three

Metaview5 of 81Not in the top three

Beamery5 of 80Not in the top three

Eightfold AI5 of 80Not in the top three

LinkedIn Talent Insights4 of 80Not in the top three

SeekOut3 of 81Not in the top three

Draup3 of 80Not in the top three

Gloat3 of 80Not in the top three

Lightcast3 of 80Not in the top three

Phenom3 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Arya. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Arya and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com7

metaview.ai6

guideflow.com4

jobspipe.dev4

learn.g2.com3

gitnux.org2

hiretruffle.com2

noon.ai2

sapia.ai2

selectsoftwarereviews.com2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Arya came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms6

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms6

jobspipe.dev/talent-intelligence-platforms4

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software4

guideflow.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software3

learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software3

gitnux.org/best/talent-intelligence-software2

noon.ai/blog/articles/145-talent-intelligence-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Arya

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Arya; a claim can dispute any of them.

Arya by Leoforce 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arya's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arya, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at arya.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.