Every category where a model named LinkedIn Talent Insights for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	20 of 77	10%	10	accepted challenger
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	65 of 88	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkedIn Talent Insights yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkedIn Talent Insights across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need to know *who* your competitors are hiring: Use LinkedIn Talent Insights.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative

“LinkedIn Talent Insights (benchmarking)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Talent intelligence · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“especially useful as a market-research layer, but typically not enough by itself for end-to-end talent intelligence” GPT-5.4 mini · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Talent Insights, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Talent Insights was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI27 of 298Not in the top three

Beamery22 of 290Not in the top three

Gloat19 of 290Not in the top three

SeekOut18 of 292Not in the top three

Phenom18 of 291Not in the top three

Pin12 of 291Not in the top three

Lightcast12 of 290Not in the top three

Metaview12 of 290Not in the top three

Findem11 of 290Not in the top three

hireEZ10 of 291Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Talent Insights. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 29 answers that named LinkedIn Talent Insights and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com20

metaview.ai18

jobspipe.dev15

xobin.com14

guideflow.com13

learn.g2.com13

g2.com12

gitnux.org11

hrtechsaas.com10

hiretruffle.com9

135 of the 135 domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Talent Insights came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms17

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms17

jobspipe.dev/talent-intelligence-platforms14

xobin.com/blog/best-talent-intelligence-platforms14

learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software13

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software13

gitnux.org/best/talent-intelligence-software11

guideflow.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Talent Insights's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Talent Insights, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkedin.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.