HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Coassemble · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Coassemble

20Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Learning management syst for small business buyers
Rank 18 of 74 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coassemble for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%18 of 740%3under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%51 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Learning experience platformsLearning and development0%40 of 800%1under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coassemble yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coassemble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“5. Coassemble — *Best for First-Time Training Programs*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coassemble, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coassemble was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TalentLMS15 of 2010Not in the top three
iSpring Learn13 of 201Not in the top three
360Learning12 of 200Not in the top three
GoSkills11 of 204Not in the top three
Docebo9 of 201Not in the top three
Connecteam7 of 200Not in the top three
Cornerstone OnDemand7 of 200Not in the top three
LearnUpon7 of 200Not in the top three
Moodle6 of 200Not in the top three
Zoho Learn5 of 200Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coassemble. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 20 answers that named Coassemble and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com11
peoplemanagingpeople.com10
capterra.com8
forbes.com8
hrkonnect.com7
continu.com4
docebo.com4
firsthr.app4
g2.com4
ispring.com4

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Coassemble came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coassemble's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coassemble, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coassemble.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack