HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › CYPHER Learning · September 2026 Edition

CYPHER · 3 categories · Named, not ranked

CYPHER Learning

17Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CYPHER Learning was named 5 times in Learning management syst and 2 other categories, where TalentLMS led with 48%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market20 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 59

under the label threshold

In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CYPHER Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	20 of 74	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	38 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	50 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CYPHER Learning yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CYPHER Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CYPHER Learning, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CYPHER Learning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo16 of 173Not in the top three

Absorb LMS13 of 170Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand13 of 170Not in the top three

360Learning12 of 170Not in the top three

TalentLMS6 of 171Not in the top three

Moodle6 of 170Not in the top three

Learn Amp5 of 170Not in the top three

LearnUpon5 of 170Not in the top three

SAP Litmos5 of 170Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors Learning5 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CYPHER Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 17 answers that named CYPHER Learning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docebo.com13

talentlms.com7

cypherlearning.comYour site6

intellum.com6

360learning.com5

forbes.com5

goskills.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

d2l.com4

g2.com4

Fifty-four of the sixty domain citations in answers naming CYPHER Learning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/best-learning-management-system6

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms6

talentlms.com/blog/best-enterprise-lms5

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared4

hrkonnect.com/feeds/blog/enterprise-learning-management-system4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-enterprise-learning-management-system4

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/docebo-vs-cornerstone3

educate-me.co/blog/enterprise-lms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CYPHER Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CYPHER Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cypherlearning.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.