HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Dayforce Wallet · September 2026 Edition
Dayforce · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Dayforce Wallet

8Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dayforce Wallet was named 1 time in Earned wage access, where Tapcheck led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In earned wage access · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dayforce Wallet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Earned wage accessCompensation and total rewards0%20 of 610%1under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dayforce Wallet yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dayforce Wallet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Generally Safe: Employer-sponsored platforms (e.g., Dayforce, ADP, Gusto, UKG) integrated directly into your work schedule.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Earned wage access · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dayforce Wallet, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dayforce Wallet was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DailyPay4 of 74Not in the top three
Payactiv3 of 71Not in the top three
ADP2 of 70Not in the top three
Branch2 of 70Not in the top three
Chime Workplace2 of 70Not in the top three
Immediate2 of 70Not in the top three
Rain2 of 70Not in the top three
Tapcheck2 of 70Not in the top three
ADP MyCheckbook1 of 70Not in the top three
Adp Flex1 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dayforce Wallet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Dayforce Wallet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adp.com2
best-earned-wage-access-providers-usa.lovable.app2
dailypay.com2
enterprise.chime.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
ca.zayzoon.com1
cnbc.com1
dataintelo.com1
dayforce.comYour site1

Fifteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Dayforce Wallet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Dayforce Wallet

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dayforce Wallet; a claim can dispute any of them.
Dayforce 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dayforce Wallet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dayforce Wallet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dayforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack