HR AI Index
Index › Vendors › Deel HR · September 2026 Edition
Deel · 9 categories · Ranked

Deel HR

57Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
9Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Workforce planning for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 89 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business28 of 114
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 89
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In workforce planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Deel HR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%17 of 890%9under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Compensation managementCompensation and total rewards0%40 of 1890%8under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management0%24 of 770%3under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
Applicant tracking systemsTalent acquisition0%17 of 500%3under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
HR help desk and case managementOnboarding and employee experience0%44 of 930%2under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26%
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%41 of 990%2under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%31 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%49 of 740%1under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
People analyticsWorkforce planning and analytics0%62 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Deel HR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Deel HR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501203
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small02608
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02305
MiniMax M2.501304

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative28 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starts at $5/employee/month, making it a cost-effective option for companies with a global workforce” Mistral Small · Workforce planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Pair it with free salary data: Use Comprehensive or Deel's benchmarking for market data” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · alternative
“Deel HR offers the best value on a per-employee basis without large up-front commitments” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · budget prompt · alternative
“it starts at $5/employee/month and is highlighted for global workforce visibility” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Deel HR, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Deel HR was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR19 of 544Not in the top three
ChartHop14 of 540Not in the top three
Pave11 of 547Not in the top three
Visier11 of 541Not in the top three
Lattice11 of 540Not in the top three
Comprehensive9 of 544Not in the top three
Monday.com9 of 540Not in the top three
Rippling9 of 540Not in the top three
Gusto8 of 542Not in the top three
Teamflect8 of 542Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Deel HR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 54 answers that named Deel HR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com42
learn.g2.com23
guideflow.com21
selectsoftwarereviews.com17
gartner.com13
firsthr.app11
g2.com11
hibob.com11
comprehensive.io10
sourceforge.net8

167 of the 167 domain citations in answers naming Deel HR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-planning-software13
comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software10
learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software10
learn.g2.com/best-workforce-planning-software10
guideflow.com/blog/hr-service-delivery-software9
selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/workforce-planning-software9
gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software8
peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compensation-management-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Deel HR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Deel HR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Deel HR (Deel Hire) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Deel HR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Deel HR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at deel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack