Every category where a model named Monday.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	2%	17 of 99	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	34 of 89	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Employee onboarding	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	103 of 104	60%	5	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Goals and OKRs	Performance and talent management	0%	50 of 54	60%	5	under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	69 of 90	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	32 of 50	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	57 of 129	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	80 of 94	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Monday.com yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Monday.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	2	3	7
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	3	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative20 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative18 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Monday.com ($9/seat) or Empxtrack (~$3/seat) are solid choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice

“For finance‑heavy organizations, DATABASICS or monday Work Management are worth evaluating.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“OR use Monday.com (Basic) to track 10-20 key roles for ~$300/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Succession planning · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Visual Workflows (Small Teams): Monday.com” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid using your internal tools (like Asana, ClickUp, or Monday) as customer-facing onboarding portals.” Mistral Small · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative

“avoid running customer onboarding through internal PM tools like Monday.com, Asana, ClickUp” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative

“these are dangerous to rely on for HR due to security concerns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative

“Many PM tools (e.g., Asana, standard Monday.com boards, ClickUp basics) offer "goal features" that are often described by users as "half-baked"” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Monday.com, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Monday.com was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Asana30 of 682Not in the top three

BambooHR19 of 680Not in the top three

ClickUp18 of 682Not in the top three

Lattice16 of 681Not in the top three

Rippling13 of 682Not in the top three

Gusto12 of 682Not in the top three

ChartHop11 of 681Not in the top three

Notion9 of 681Not in the top three

Deel HR9 of 680Not in the top three

Trello9 of 680Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Monday.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 68 answers that named Monday.com and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com29

g2.com16

monday.comYour site15

selectsoftwarereviews.com15

learn.g2.com14

firsthr.app12

gartner.com12

guideflow.com11

capterra.com9

okrstool.com9

127 of the 142 domain citations in answers naming Monday.com came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-planning-software13

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/workforce-planning-software10

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-planning-software8

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software7

monday.com/blog/project-management/succession-planning-software7

mooncamp.com/blog/best-okr-software7

talentguard.com/blog/10-best-role-readiness-planning-software-for-20257

cubesoftware.com/blog/workforce-planning-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Monday.com

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Monday.com; a claim can dispute any of them.

monday AI Workspace 4monday.com 4Monday 3Monday.com (Basic Plan) 1monday AI 1monday AI Work Platform 1monday Work Management 1monday Work Platform 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Monday.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Monday.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at monday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.