HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Trello · September 2026 Edition
6 categories · Named, not ranked

Trello

29Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
6Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Trello was named 8 times in Employee onboarding and 5 other categories, where BambooHR led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trello for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%45 of 1040%2under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%36 of 600%2under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
Applicant tracking systemsTalent acquisition0%35 of 500%1under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%57 of 970%1under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%
Goals and OKRsPerformance and talent management0%30 of 540%1under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29%
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%77 of 89100%1under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trello yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01304
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Visual Approach: Trello ... The free plan is excellent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they lack the depth for headcount modeling, "what-if" scenario planning, and skills gap analysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trello, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trello was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Notion14 of 290Not in the top three
Asana13 of 291Not in the top three
BambooHR10 of 291Not in the top three
Gusto9 of 291Not in the top three
Monday.com9 of 291Not in the top three
Google Sheets7 of 291Not in the top three
Workday7 of 290Not in the top three
Lattice6 of 290Not in the top three
Zoho People5 of 294Not in the top three
ClickUp5 of 292Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trello. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 29 answers that named Trello and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trello.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.