| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 45 of 104 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29% |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 36 of 60 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41% |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 35 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47% |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 57 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35% |
| Goals and OKRs | Performance and talent management | 0% | 30 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Tability at 29% |
| Workforce planning | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 77 of 89 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Visual Approach: Trello ... The free plan is excellent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Goals and OKRs · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they lack the depth for headcount modeling, "what-if" scenario planning, and skills gap analysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 29 answers that named Trello and are not a share of its labels.
Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Trello came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trello.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.