Index › Products › E-Monitor · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

E-Monitor

10Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. E-Monitor was named 3 times in Employee monitoring, where ActivTrak led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business25 of 75

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 75

under the label threshold

Enterprise27 of 73

under the label threshold

In employee monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named E-Monitor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee monitoring	Workforce planning and analytics	4%	6 of 75	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for E-Monitor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated E-Monitor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need full monitoring cheapest: Go with E-Monitor or Time Champ (~$3.90/user).” Kimi K2 · Employee monitoring · budget prompt · first choice

“Most comprehensive at this price point” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee monitoring · direct prompt · first choice

“E-Monitor is highlighted for 14 integrated modules covering activity monitoring, screen capture, time tracking, DLP” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee monitoring · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as E-Monitor, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and E-Monitor was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hubstaff6 of 101Not among the top eight

ActivTrak5 of 101Not among the top eight

Clockify4 of 102Not among the top eight

Teramind4 of 101Not among the top eight

Time Doctor3 of 101Not among the top eight

Controlio3 of 100Not among the top eight

Insightful3 of 100Not among the top eight

Time Champ3 of 100Not among the top eight

Veriato3 of 100Not among the top eight

TimeCamp2 of 101Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named E-Monitor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named E-Monitor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

employee-monitoring.net10

fitsmallbusiness.com5

forbes.com5

insightful.io5

traqq.com5

desklog.io4

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

currentware.com3

greengeeks.com3

learn.g2.com3

No domain is on file for E-Monitor, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

fitsmallbusiness.com/employee-monitoring-software5

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-monitoring-software5

traqq.com/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software5

desklog.io/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software4

employee-monitoring.net/blog/employee-monitoring-comparison-matrix4

currentware.com/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software3

greengeeks.com/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software3

learn.g2.com/best-employee-monitoring-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where E-Monitor stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 210 a month (“e-monitor”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 206 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 75 in employee monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ActivTrak

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 10 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow E-Monitor

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when E-Monitor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as E-Monitor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for E-Monitor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where E-Monitor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name E-Monitor, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.