AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Flores · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Flores

22Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in HSA & FSA admin for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Flores →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hsa & fsa admin · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Flores for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
HSA and FSA administratorsCompensation and total rewards0%17 of 1110%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Flores yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Flores across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A leading Third-Party Administrator (TPA) that bundles FSA with other reimbursement plans” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HSA & FSA admin · comparative prompt · alternative
“Broad reimbursement and lifestyle benefit suite: WEX Health or Flores.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HSA & FSA admin · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Flores, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flores was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HealthEquity21 of 2210Not among the top eight
Fidelity HSA18 of 223Not among the top eight
HSA Bank16 of 220Not among the top eight
Lively13 of 226Not among the top eight
Businessolver11 of 222Not among the top eight
WEX Health11 of 221Not among the top eight
TASC10 of 221Not among the top eight
Navia Benefit Solutions9 of 221Not among the top eight
Further9 of 220Not among the top eight
Ameriflex7 of 221Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flores. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Flores and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com22
zipdo.co15
getbenepass.com12
myshortlister.com11
solutions.mycafehealth.com11
wifitalents.com10
gitnux.org9
vendordirectory.shrm.org9
hraddict.com8
worldmetrics.org8

No domain is on file for Flores, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Flores stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
135,000 a month (“flores”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
48,335 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 111 in HSA & FSA admin
Segment leader
29%
HealthEquity
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
22 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Flores

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flores's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flores, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Flores by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Flores is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Flores, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.