Index › Vendors › G2O · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

G2O

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. G2O was named 1 time in Global payroll, where Deel led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market63 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named G2O for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	0%	63 of 66	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for G2O yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated G2O across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“G2O has a smaller country footprint and has been noted for slow onboarding and support” Mistral Small · Global payroll · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as G2O, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and G2O was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Deel1 of 11Not in the top three

Remote1 of 11Not in the top three

ADP GlobalView/Celergo1 of 10Not in the top three

Foxhire1 of 10Not in the top three

Multiplier1 of 10Not in the top three

Oyster1 of 10Not in the top three

Papaya Global1 of 10Not in the top three

Payoneer Workforce Management1 of 10Not in the top three

Rippling1 of 10Not in the top three

Talent5001 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named G2O. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named G2O and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eorhq.com1

nativeteams.com1

remote.com1

selectsoftwarereviews.com1

No domain is on file for G2O, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

eorhq.com/guides/global-payroll-providers1

nativeteams.com/blog/global-payroll-software-vs-eor-2026-comparison-guide1

remote.com/blog/eor-peo/deel-vs-rippling-vs-remote-vs-papaya-global1

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-global-payroll-providers1

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/eor-services1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as G2O

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as G2O; a claim can dispute any of them.

G2O (by Velocity Global) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when G2O's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as G2O, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.