HR AI Index
Index Vendors › GoHire · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

GoHire

10Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. GoHire was named 3 times in Applicant tracking syste and 2 other categories, where Greenhouse led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In applicant tracking syste · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named GoHire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Applicant tracking systemsTalent acquisition0%22 of 500%1under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition0%39 of 1090%1under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Recruiting CRM and sourcingTalent acquisition0%59 of 880%1under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GoHire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GoHire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“GoHire or other small-business recruiting platforms can be better fits for low-budget hiring” GPT-5.4 mini · Job advertising · budget prompt · alternative
“If you want simplicity: GoHire – under $100/month with a focused feature set” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GoHire, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoHire was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Breezy HR6 of 104Not in the top three
JazzHR5 of 101Not in the top three
Ashby4 of 100Not in the top three
Zoho Recruit4 of 100Not in the top three
100Hires3 of 100Not in the top three
Greenhouse3 of 100Not in the top three
Teamtailor3 of 100Not in the top three
BambooHR2 of 101Not in the top three
Workable2 of 100Not in the top three
JobTarget1 of 101Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoHire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named GoHire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ventureharbour.com5
hiretruffle.com4
selectsoftwarereviews.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
techreport.com3
uschamber.com3
100hires.com2
cxeverywhere.com2
forbes.com2
g2.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming GoHire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoHire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoHire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gohire.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.