HR AI Index
Index Vendors › HR Cloud · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

HR Cloud

15Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HR Cloud was named 3 times in Employee onboarding and 2 other categories, where BambooHR led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HR Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%82 of 104100%1under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%
HR help desk and case managementOnboarding and employee experience0%69 of 930%1under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26%
HRIS and HCM platformsCore HR and payroll0%31 of 460%1under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HR Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HR Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Integration issues with external data feeds” Kimi K2 · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HR Cloud, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HR Cloud was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR8 of 152Not in the top three
Workday6 of 152Not in the top three
Rippling6 of 151Not in the top three
UKG Pro5 of 150Not in the top three
Gusto4 of 151Not in the top three
SAP SuccessFactors4 of 150Not in the top three
Deel3 of 150Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM3 of 150Not in the top three
Workday HCM2 of 151Not in the top three
ADP2 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HR Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named HR Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrcloud.comYour site11
forbes.com6
gartner.com5
paycor.com5
peoplemanagingpeople.com5
outsail.co3
resources.rework.com3
waybook.com3
bamboohr.com2
bestrecruitingtools.com2

Thirty-four of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming HR Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as HR Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HR Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
HR Cloud / Onboard by HR Cloud 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HR Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HR Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hrcloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack