Every category where a model named iCIMS Talent Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	72 of 77	45%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iCIMS Talent Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iCIMS Talent Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Good for mid-market to enterprise organizations ... wanting a trusted ATS backbone with incremental AI sourcing layered on top.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative

“iCIMS Talent Cloud provides a familiar backbone with incremental AI sourcing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative

“Greenhouse or iCIMS if your main need is a more traditional recruiting suite” GPT-5.4 mini · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best All-in-One ATS Solution: iCIMS Talent Cloud” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid in the Mid-Market - Enterprise suites (Beamery, Phenom, iCIMS AI):” Kimi K2 · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · hard negative

“iCIMS (up to $750K over 3 years) are designed for large organizations” Kimi K2 · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative

“iCIMS $250K–750K+ over three years” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative

“three-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) can reach $750K, which may be a significant investment” Llama 4 Maverick · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iCIMS Talent Cloud, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iCIMS Talent Cloud was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Phenom27 of 300Not in the top three

Eightfold AI24 of 304Not in the top three

Beamery24 of 300Not in the top three

Pin19 of 307Not in the top three

Gem16 of 305Not in the top three

Gloat12 of 300Not in the top three

SeekOut11 of 302Not in the top three

Workday Skills Cloud10 of 300Not in the top three

hireEZ10 of 300Not in the top three

Lessie AI8 of 303Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iCIMS Talent Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 30 answers that named iCIMS Talent Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com28

hiretruffle.com17

g2.com16

metaview.ai16

learn.g2.com14

xobin.com13

wrangle.ai12

guideflow.com10

lessie.ai10

jobspipe.dev9

145 of the 145 domain citations in answers naming iCIMS Talent Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms24

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software20

hiretruffle.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms16

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms16

learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software14

xobin.com/blog/best-talent-intelligence-platforms13

wrangle.ai/blogs/best-talent-intelligence-platforms-202612

g2.com/categories/talent-intelligence10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as iCIMS Talent Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iCIMS Talent Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.

iCIMS 6iCIMS AI 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iCIMS Talent Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iCIMS Talent Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at icims.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.