HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Konstantly · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Konstantly

4Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Konstantly was named 2 times in Compliance training, where Traliant led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business32 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market64 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Konstantly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	64 of 80	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Konstantly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Konstantly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with Konstantly. Their $29/month flat-rate plan is incredibly difficult to beat.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance training · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“though it may be less ideal for very small teams than TalentLMS or Coggno” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Konstantly, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Konstantly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coggno3 of 42Not in the top three

TalentLMS3 of 41Not in the top three

Docebo2 of 40Not in the top three

SC Training2 of 40Not in the top three

LifterLMS1 of 41Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand1 of 40Not in the top three

EasyLlama1 of 40Not in the top three

Valamis1 of 40Not in the top three

iSpring Learn1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Konstantly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named Konstantly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

konstantly.comYour site2

valamis.com2

bizlibrary.com1

coggno.com1

compliquest.com1

continu.com1

digitalhill.com1

docebo.com1

employmentlawhandbook.com1

expertinsights.com1

Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Konstantly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bizlibrary.com/blog/compliance-safety/best-compliance-training-software-comparison1

coggno.com/blog/10-best-compliance-lms-platforms-for-20261

coggno.com/blog/best-budget-compliance-training-providers-reporting-audit-documentation1

coggno.com/blog/budget-friendly-compliance-training-platforms1

compliquest.com/en/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms-compared-20261

continu.com/software/best-compliance-training-software1

digitalhill.com/blog/best-affordable-lms-small-business-20261

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/corporate-learning-management-systems1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Konstantly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Konstantly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at konstantly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.