12 categories · RankedPersonio
81Judge labels
5First choices
13Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
12Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in People analytics for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 96
5%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market11 of 99
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise65 of 71
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Personio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 2% | 11 of 99 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15% |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 21 of 104 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29% |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 25 of 46 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22% |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 180 of 189 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 15 of 50 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47% |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 42 of 89 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 49 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16% |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 56 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26% |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 62 of 129 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26% |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 63 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 99 of 162 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19% |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 46 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Personio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated Personio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels1
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative23 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labels2
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative81 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best HR analytics software for a mid-sized B2B company would be Personio, HiBob, or Lattice.” Llama 4 Maverick · People analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Excellent for European/Mid-market UK companies. Combines Core HR, Recruitment, and a built-in ticketing/help desk interface” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HR help desk · direct prompt · alternative
“mid-market HRIS platforms ... (like HiBob, Lattice, Leapsome, or Personio) have built-in career pathing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · scale prompt · alternative
“Ideal if you're based in the UK/Europe and want a unified HR platform with integrated analytics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · People analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you do not need a separate onboarding tool like Personio or Lattice just to collect paperwork” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bug-ridden platform... Terrible customer service” Kimi K2 · HRIS and HCM platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“broad HR suites with basic compensation tools ... typically lack the depth and flexibility of dedicated compensation platforms” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Broad HR suites with basic comp tools; convenient but generally not as deep or flexible as dedicated platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Compensation management · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Personio, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Personio was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Personio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 80 answers that named Personio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
personio.comYour site34
peoplemanagingpeople.com33
jugglehire.com20
selectsoftwarereviews.com20
hibob.com19
eletive.com18
firsthr.app18
hr.university18
thrivesparrow.com16
g2.com15
177 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming Personio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Personio
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Personio; a claim can dispute any of them.
Personio Analytics 1Personio Recruiting 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Personio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Personio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at personio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.