HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Ramp · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Ramp

8Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ramp was named 3 times in Flexible benefits and 1 other category, where Compt led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In flexible benefits · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ramp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accountsCompensation and total rewards2%14 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics0%63 of 9750%2under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ramp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ramp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have a corporate card: Stick with Ramp or Divvy.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Flexible benefits · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“these are not true VMS platforms for contingent worker solutions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ramp, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ramp was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SAP Fieldglass6 of 80Not in the top three
SimpleVMS5 of 85Not in the top three
Beeline4 of 80Not in the top three
QuickBooks Online4 of 80Not in the top three
Deel2 of 81Not in the top three
Conexis VMS2 of 80Not in the top three
Precoro2 of 80Not in the top three
Workday VNDLY2 of 80Not in the top three
JOON1 of 81Not in the top three
VendorJot1 of 81Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ramp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Ramp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com6
zapro.ai5
connecteam.com4
hrtechsaas.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
rippling.com4
softwareconnect.com4
capterra.com3
conexisvmssoftware.com3
g2.com3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Ramp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ramp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ramp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ramp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.