Every category where a model named Conexis VMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	7%	5 of 97	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conexis VMS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conexis VMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels5

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting your evaluation with Conexis VMS due to its purpose-built mid-market focus” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice

“is SimpleVMS, Worksuite, Conexis VMS, Gatekeeper, or Procurify” Llama 4 Maverick · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Staffing Agency Management: Conexis VMS” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice

“followed by solutions like Conexis or VectorVMS that emphasize ease of implementation and cost-effectiveness” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conexis VMS, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conexis VMS was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Beeline20 of 252Not in the top three

SAP Fieldglass19 of 250Not in the top three

SimpleVMS18 of 2511Not in the top three

Worksuite10 of 250Not in the top three

Workday VNDLY9 of 251Not in the top three

VectorVMS9 of 250Not in the top three

Magnit7 of 251Not in the top three

SimplifyVMS4 of 251Not in the top three

Deel4 of 250Not in the top three

Procurify3 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conexis VMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 25 answers that named Conexis VMS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com17

conexisvmssoftware.comYour site13

talentdesk.io13

zapro.ai10

rippling.com9

connecteam.com8

g2.com7

softwareadvice.com7

spendbase.co7

aihratlas.com6

Eighty-four of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Conexis VMS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce17

talentdesk.io/blog/best-vendor-management-systems11

zapro.ai/vendor-management/best-vendor-management-software-for-smes10

rippling.com/blog/vendor-management-systems9

connecteam.com/vendor-management-systems8

conexisvmssoftware.com/7

aihratlas.com/categories/contingent-workforce-management6

learn.g2.com/best-vendor-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Conexis VMS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Conexis VMS; a claim can dispute any of them.

Conexis 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conexis VMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conexis VMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conexisvmssoftware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.