HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Reclaim.ai · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Reclaim.ai

10Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reclaim.ai was named 6 times in Workforce scheduling, where Deputy led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise96 of 117

under the label threshold

In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Reclaim.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	22 of 94	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Reclaim.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Reclaim.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Reclaim.ai is the most balanced AI tool for individuals and small teams” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Reclaim.ai is strongest for AI time-blocking and calendar optimization” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Reclaim.ai is considered the best for AI-powered calendar optimization” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Reclaim.ai, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reclaim.ai was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly9 of 104Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling6 of 100Not in the top three

Cal.com6 of 100Not in the top three

Doodle6 of 100Not in the top three

Motion6 of 100Not in the top three

Clockwise5 of 100Not in the top three

SavvyCal4 of 100Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe4 of 100Not in the top three

Connecteam3 of 101Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reclaim.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named Reclaim.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

youcanbook.me6

cal.com5

workflowautomation.net5

calendly.com4

capterra.com4

forbes.com4

schedly.io3

worldmetrics.org3

adamenfroy.com2

connecteam.com2

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Reclaim.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

workflowautomation.net/guides/best-scheduling-software5

youcanbook.me/blog/best-scheduling-apps5

capterra.com/resources/best-scheduling-software-reviews-analysis4

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-scheduling-apps4

cal.com/blog/best-scheduling-apps3

calendly.com/blog/scheduling-software-tools3

adamenfroy.com/scheduling-software2

cal.com/blog/enterprise-scheduling-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reclaim.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reclaim.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reclaim.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.