HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Recooty · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Recooty

8Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Recooty was named 5 times in AI recruiting assistants and 1 other category, where GoPerfect led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business30 of 70

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Recooty for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	2%	18 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	25 of 50	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Recooty yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Recooty across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recooty hits the sweet spot of price and features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · first choice

“Recooty offers a cost-effective flat-fee ATS starting at $79/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“described as a very small vendor, which raises concern about long-term vendor stability” Perplexity Sonar · Applicant tracking syste · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Recooty, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Recooty was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Manatal6 of 80Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit5 of 81Not in the top three

Workable4 of 80Not in the top three

Breezy HR3 of 82Not in the top three

Ashby3 of 80Not in the top three

JazzHR3 of 80Not in the top three

Pin2 of 81Not in the top three

BambooHR2 of 80Not in the top three

Fetcher2 of 80Not in the top three

Greenhouse2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Recooty. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Recooty and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com5

pin.com4

zapier.com4

hiretruffle.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

franklandautomation.com2

leonar.app2

thehirehub.ai2

aiproductivity.ai1

asymbl.com1

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Recooty came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/ai-recruiting3

franklandautomation.com/best-applicant-tracking-systems-ats-in-2026-compared-ranked2

hiretruffle.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems2

pin.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools-small-teams2

pin.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems2

thehirehub.ai/guides/ai-recruiting-tools2

zapier.com/blog/ai-recruiting-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recooty's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recooty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at recooty.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.