HR AI Index
Index Vendors › RedeApp · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

RedeApp

15Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Frontline employee apps for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 97 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named RedeApp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Frontline employee appsOnboarding and employee experience7%4 of 970%9under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RedeApp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RedeApp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211204
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained10 labels4
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a truly limited budget: Start with RedeApp's free plan - it has no user caps and is built specifically for frontline workers” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · first choice
“If your budget is literally $0: Go with RedeApp (Go tier).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall: RedeApp (free forever)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · first choice
“Can reach workers without app installs via text; has a true free tier for unlimited users.” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RedeApp, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RedeApp was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Connecteam11 of 156Not in the top three
Blink11 of 152Not in the top three
Beekeeper8 of 150Not in the top three
Staffbase6 of 150Not in the top three
Firstup5 of 150Not in the top three
Homebase4 of 150Not in the top three
Microsoft Teams3 of 150Not in the top three
Pumble3 of 150Not in the top three
Slack3 of 150Not in the top three
Sling3 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RedeApp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named RedeApp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

redeapp.comYour site14
joinblink.com12
shifton.com8
mangoapps.com7
rock.so7
getzelos.com6
staffbase.com6
turnonwork.com6
guideflow.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4

Sixty of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming RedeApp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as RedeApp

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RedeApp; a claim can dispute any of them.
RedeApp Go 2RedeApp (Go Plan) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RedeApp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RedeApp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at redeapp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.