Every category where a model named Reejig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	27 of 77	20%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Reejig yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Reejig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“strong emphasis on "redployment" ... and fair, ethical AI for internal mobility” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Issues with LinkedIn integration suggest that Reejig needs to improve collaboration.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative

“Lowest scores (~3.0-3.5) for some like Reejig, HiredScore” Grok 4.1 Fast · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Reejig, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reejig was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI13 of 133Not in the top three

SeekOut9 of 131Not in the top three

365Talents7 of 130Not in the top three

Metaview7 of 130Not in the top three

Beamery6 of 130Not in the top three

Gem6 of 130Not in the top three

Loxo6 of 130Not in the top three

Pin6 of 130Not in the top three

hireEZ6 of 130Not in the top three

Gloat4 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reejig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named Reejig and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

metaview.ai10

pin.com9

learn.g2.com7

guideflow.com5

hiretruffle.com4

eightfold.ai3

jobspipe.dev3

skima.ai3

asymbl.com2

bestrecruitingtools.com2

Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Reejig came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms10

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms8

learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software7

guideflow.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software5

hiretruffle.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms3

jobspipe.dev/talent-intelligence-platforms3

skima.ai/blog/industry-trends-and-insights/talent-intelligence-tools3

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-talent-intelligence-platforms-enterprise-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reejig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reejig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reejig.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.