HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Skedulo · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Skedulo

16Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skedulo was named 9 times in Frontline employee apps, where Connecteam led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 72

under the label threshold

Mid-market8 of 97

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 101

under the label threshold

In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skedulo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	8 of 97	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skedulo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skedulo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase14 labels2

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My Top Recommendation: MangoApps or Skedulo” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Skedulo or BigChange | Scheduled/dispatch to locations, job management, tracking, and invoicing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If you need robust scheduling and dispatch for a larger or more complex field team, consider Skedulo.” Mistral Small · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Skedulo if your team is more about mobile field dispatch and route/visit scheduling” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“note that Skedulo has a ~$50k/year minimum and is better suited for larger organizations” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skedulo, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skedulo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam13 of 169Not in the top three

Deputy12 of 160Not in the top three

Blink10 of 160Not in the top three

When I Work5 of 160Not in the top three

UKG Pro4 of 161Not in the top three

Dayforce4 of 160Not in the top three

MangoApps4 of 160Not in the top three

WorkJam4 of 160Not in the top three

UKG Pro Workforce Management2 of 162Not in the top three

Staffbase2 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skedulo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Skedulo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com15

mangoapps.com11

hrtechsaas.com10

joinblink.com10

peoplemanagingpeople.com7

pebb.io6

workstream.us6

g2.com5

agilityportal.io4

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com4

Seventy-eight of the seventy-eight domain citations in answers naming Skedulo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/deskless-workforce-software13

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-deskless-workforce-management-platforms10

joinblink.com/intelligence/the-complete-guide-to-team-communication-tools-for-deskless-tea9

mangoapps.com/articles/best-employee-app-software9

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-management-software7

workstream.us/blog/employee-communication-app-deskless-workforce6

pebb.io/articles/best-workforce-management-apps5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skedulo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skedulo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skedulo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.