HR AI Index
Index Vendors › SumTotal · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

SumTotal

9Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SumTotal was named 2 times in Learning experience plat and 1 other category, where Learn Amp led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SumTotal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Learning experience platformsLearning and development0%58 of 80100%1under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%71 of 74100%1under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SumTotal yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SumTotal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Unless you are a massive Fortune 500 company with a dedicated team of full-time LMS administrators, you should avoid them.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
“Long-term roadmap is unclear as Cornerstone integrates it.” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SumTotal, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SumTotal was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Docebo7 of 91Not in the top three
Cornerstone OnDemand7 of 90Not in the top three
Moodle5 of 90Not in the top three
Saba5 of 90Not in the top three
Absorb LMS4 of 90Not in the top three
Blackboard Learn4 of 90Not in the top three
360Learning3 of 90Not in the top three
Canvas LMS3 of 90Not in the top three
SAP SuccessFactors Learning3 of 90Not in the top three
Workday Learning3 of 90Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SumTotal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 9 answers that named SumTotal and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elearningindustry.com5
docebo.com4
firsthr.app3
g2.com3
lmspedia.org3
reddit.com3
stylelearn.com3
talentedlearning.com3
360learning.com2
cypherlearning.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming SumTotal came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SumTotal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SumTotal; a claim can dispute any of them.
SumTotal Systems 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SumTotal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SumTotal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sumtotal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack