HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › TalentNest · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

TalentNest

7Judge labels

4First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TalentNest was named 3 times in Recruitment marketing, where Teamtailor led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business10 of 90

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TalentNest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	4%	11 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TalentNest yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TalentNest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels4

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best career site builder for a mid-sized B2B company would be TalentNest, Workable, or iCIMS” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“TalentNest is an excellent choice specifically designed for your situation.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Mid-sized companies wanting a dedicated, easy-to-use career site builder with a built-in ATS” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TalentNest, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TalentNest was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenhouse3 of 71Not in the top three

Lever3 of 70Not in the top three

iCIMS3 of 70Not in the top three

Workable2 of 71Not in the top three

HireVue2 of 70Not in the top three

Joveo2 of 70Not in the top three

MokaHR2 of 70Not in the top three

hire.page1 of 71Not in the top three

Ashby1 of 70Not in the top three

BambooHR Recruiting1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TalentNest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named TalentNest and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

joveo.com7

mokahr.io7

hire.page6

blog.ongig.com4

resources.rework.com2

sourcrlab.com2

voyse.co.uk2

100hires.com1

emergent.sh1

forbes.com1

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming TalentNest came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

joveo.com/blog/best-career-site-builders7

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-career-site-builder7

hire.page/blog/best-career-page-builders-20266

blog.ongig.com/candidate-experience/best-career-site-builder4

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-career-page-builder3

resources.rework.com/de/tools/recruiting-ats/best-career-page-software-20262

sourcrlab.com/best/best-career-site-tools2

voyse.co.uk/insights/career-site-builders-compared2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TalentNest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TalentNest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at talen.to is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.