HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › MokaHR · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

MokaHR

21Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MokaHR was named 5 times in Recruitment marketing and 2 other categories, where Teamtailor led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business65 of 90

under the label threshold

Mid-market30 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 72

under the label threshold

In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MokaHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	30 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	44 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	23 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MokaHR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MokaHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative8 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MokaHR consistently outperforms competitors—delivering up to 3× faster candidate screening with 87% accuracy” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · first choice

“For the most complete AI-powered suite with advanced scheduling plus analytics, MokaHR leads” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Mokka if your team is drowning in resume volume” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“MokaHR is also well-suited for mid-market companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MokaHR, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MokaHR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Phenom10 of 211Not in the top three

Greenhouse8 of 210Not in the top three

Symphony Talent8 of 210Not in the top three

Avature7 of 210Not in the top three

Joveo5 of 212Not in the top three

Beamery5 of 210Not in the top three

Workable4 of 211Not in the top three

Lever4 of 210Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters4 of 210Not in the top three

iCIMS4 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MokaHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named MokaHR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mokahr.ioYour site19

joveo.com11

selectsoftwarereviews.com10

g2.com9

recruiterslineup.com6

learn.g2.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

blog.ongig.com4

hire.page4

hiretruffle.com4

Fifty-eight of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming MokaHR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms6

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-recruitment-marketing-platforms6

joveo.com/blog/best-career-site-builders5

recruiterslineup.com/best-enterprise-recruitment-marketing-platforms5

blog.ongig.com/candidate-experience/best-career-site-builder4

hire.page/blog/best-career-page-builders-20264

recruiterflow.com/blog/best-recruitment-marketing-tools4

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MokaHR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MokaHR; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mokka 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MokaHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MokaHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mokahr.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.