Every category where a model named Symphony Talent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	38 of 81	22%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Symphony Talent yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Symphony Talent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	3	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why avoid? This platform is often cited as expensive and designed primarily for large enterprises.” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid these if you are a mid-market or rapidly scaling company.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“enterprise-grade recruitment marketing platforms (RMPs) like Phenom, Beamery, or Symphony Talent, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · soft negative

“these tend to be more enterprise-focused and may be overkill for mid-sized companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Symphony Talent, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Symphony Talent was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Phenom50 of 5213Not in the top three

Beamery36 of 521Not in the top three

Avature26 of 521Not in the top three

Joveo23 of 522Not in the top three

Greenhouse20 of 522Not in the top three

iCIMS17 of 520Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters14 of 520Not in the top three

Appcast13 of 521Not in the top three

Bullhorn13 of 521Not in the top three

Teamtailor12 of 523Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Symphony Talent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 52 answers that named Symphony Talent and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com38

joveo.com36

selectsoftwarereviews.com33

g2.com30

mokahr.io20

recruitcompare.io18

builtin.com17

bestrecruitingtools.com13

recruiterslineup.com11

thedailyhire.com11

227 of the 227 domain citations in answers naming Symphony Talent came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms34

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software29

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms28

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing21

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platform-for-enterprises16

recruitcompare.io/best/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms16

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-recruitment-marketing-software-enterprise-202613

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-recruitment-marketing-platforms13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Symphony Talent

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Symphony Talent; a claim can dispute any of them.

SmashFly (Symphony Talent) 2SmashFly 1Symphony Talent (formerly SmashFly) 1Symphony Talent (which acquired SmashFly) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Symphony Talent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Symphony Talent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at symphonytalent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.