HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Teamed · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Teamed

7Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Teamed was named 4 times in Global payroll, where Deel led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 42

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 54

under the label threshold

In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Teamed for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	2%	12 of 66	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teamed yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teamed across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the strongest single pick from the results is Teamed” Perplexity Sonar · Global payroll · direct prompt · first choice

“For concierge, expert‑led service: Teamed or WorkMotion” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global payroll · direct prompt · alternative

“Teamed (flat, no-hidden-fees pricing)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · direct prompt · alternative

“Teamed — Best for Advisory-Led Service” Kimi K2 · Global payroll · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teamed, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamed was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Remote7 of 71Not in the top three

Deel6 of 72Not in the top three

Multiplier4 of 70Not in the top three

Oyster4 of 70Not in the top three

G-P3 of 72Not in the top three

Papaya Global3 of 70Not in the top three

RemoFirst2 of 71Not in the top three

Safeguard Global2 of 71Not in the top three

Rippling2 of 70Not in the top three

Gusto1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teamed. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Teamed and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

teamed.globalYour site6

safeguardglobal.com5

gartner.com4

hivedesk.com4

hr.software4

employsome.com3

gloroots.com3

omnihr.co3

employborderless.com2

eorhq.com2

Thirty of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Teamed came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

safeguardglobal.com/resources/blog/best-employer-of-record-providers5

gartner.com/reviews/market/employer-of-record-eor4

hivedesk.com/compliance/best-employer-of-record-companies4

teamed.global/insights/best-eor-companies-2026-big-names-and-rising-players4

omnihr.co/blog/employer-of-record-mid-market3

teamed.global/compare/best-eor-for-mid-market3

employsome.com/employer-of-record/best-eor2

globaleorservices.org/eor-knowledge-center/deel-vs-remote-vs-rippling-vs-oyster-hr-2026-be2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamed's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamed, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teamed.global is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.