HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready was named 1 time in Workforce management sui, where ADP Workforce Now led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market30 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In workforce management sui · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	30 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for complex frontline labor: UKG” GPT-5.4 mini · Workforce management sui · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dayforce2 of 30Not in the top three

Workday2 of 30Not in the top three

ADP1 of 30Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Manager / ADP Time & Attendance1 of 30Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now1 of 30Not in the top three

ATOSS1 of 30Not in the top three

Blue Yonder Workforce Management1 of 30Not in the top three

Infor Workforce Management1 of 30Not in the top three

Infor Workforce Management / Infor HCM1 of 30Not in the top three

NICE Workforce Management1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ukg.comYour site2

adp.com1

apps365.com1

awms-system.com1

business.com1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1

ciopages.com1

factorialhr.com1

forbes.com1

gartner.com1

Nine of the eleven domain citations in answers naming UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

adp.com/compare/adp-vs-ukg.aspx1

apps365.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software1

awms-system.com/website/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Market_Guide_for_Workforce.pdf1

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/amp/tools/10-best-workforce-management-software-for-enter1

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/hcm-hr-platform1

factorialhr.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software1

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UKG Pro Workforce Management / UKG Ready, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ukg.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.