HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Workday Prism Analytics · September 2026 Edition

Workday · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Workday Prism Analytics

9Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workday Prism Analytics was named 2 times in People analytics, where HiBob led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business84 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market40 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprise55 of 71

under the label threshold

In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workday Prism Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	40 of 99	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Prism Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Prism Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Workday‑centric org: Workday People Analytics / Prism” GLM 4.7 FlashX · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Prism Analytics, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Prism Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visier8 of 95Not in the top three

One Model7 of 93Not in the top three

BambooHR5 of 92Not in the top three

Crunchr5 of 91Not in the top three

Culture Amp4 of 90Not in the top three

ChartHop3 of 90Not in the top three

Eletive3 of 90Not in the top three

Tableau3 of 90Not in the top three

Workday People Analytics3 of 90Not in the top three

HiBob2 of 91Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Prism Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 9 answers that named Workday Prism Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrbench.com4

thrivesparrow.com4

eletive.com3

workhuman.com2

adp.com1

agile-hr-analytics.com1

bangaloreorbit.com1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1

devopsschool.com1

engagedly.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Workday Prism Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrbench.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software4

thrivesparrow.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software4

eletive.com/blog/people-analytics-tools3

workhuman.com/blog/people-analytics-software2

adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/p/people-analytics-pitfalls.aspx1

agile-hr-analytics.com/top-people-analytics-tools-2026-comparison-guide1

bangaloreorbit.com/blog/top-10-hr-analytics-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/10-best-hr-analytics-tools-for-enterprises/133883571

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday Prism Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Prism Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workday People Analytics / Prism 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Prism Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Prism Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.