2 categories · Named, not rankedWorkiva
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee giving and volunteering | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 46 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Millie at 22% | |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 91 of 97 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Workiva across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Look at Workiva for controlled, audit-ready reporting” GPT-6 Luna · Giving & volunteering · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise-grade; likely too heavy and expensive for mid-market” Kimi K2 · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workiva, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workiva was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Workiva and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Workiva came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workiva.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workiva takes 0% of first choices and Millie takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 22,200 a month (“workiva”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 524 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 58,186 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,258 · 772 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,677
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $23 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 338 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 66 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workiva.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Workiva
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workiva is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Purpose-Built for Finance, Audit, Risk & Sustainability
- For
- finance, audit, risk and sustainability teams
- Customers named
- The Hershey CompanyAmalgamated BankAESSouthwestNXP
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workiva's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: workiva.com, workiva.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workiva's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workiva, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workiva by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workiva is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workiva, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.