HR AI Index
Index › Vendors › Wrangle · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Wrangle

16Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Talent intelligence for small business buyers
Rank 22 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 84
4%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market22 of 77
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 67
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In talent intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wrangle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Talent intelligencePerformance and talent management0%22 of 770%4under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wrangle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wrangle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wrangle — Mid-Range Option ... $199/month with free trial” Kimi K2 · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“Other options to consider are Metaview and Wrangle.” Llama 4 Maverick · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · alternative
“Wrangle at $199/month with trial” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wrangle, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wrangle was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gem14 of 163Not in the top three
Beamery13 of 160Not in the top three
Eightfold AI13 of 160Not in the top three
Pin12 of 162Not in the top three
Lessie AI10 of 167Not in the top three
Metaview9 of 162Not in the top three
Phenom9 of 160Not in the top three
Loxo8 of 160Not in the top three
iCIMS Talent Cloud8 of 160Not in the top three
SeekOut6 of 161Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wrangle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Wrangle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wrangle.aiYour site16
pin.com14
learn.g2.com13
lessie.ai11
metaview.ai11
guideflow.com8
g2.com7
hiretruffle.com7
skima.ai7
xobin.com5

Eighty-three of the ninety-nine domain citations in answers naming Wrangle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wrangle.ai/blogs/best-talent-intelligence-platforms-202616
learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software13
pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms12
lessie.ai/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms11
metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms11
pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software8
g2.com/categories/talent-intelligence/small-business7
guideflow.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wrangle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wrangle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wrangle.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack