AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Perdoo vs Tability
Goals and OKRs · October 2026 Edition

Perdoo vs Tability

Five of fourteen models named Perdoo first on the direct prompt; seven named Tability. Perdoo was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Tability by twelve and Perdoo carries 44 labels and Tability 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Perdoo

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Tability

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share24%22%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4432A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Perdoo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Profit.co was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Perdoo vs Lattice · Perdoo vs OKRs Tool · Perdoo vs Profit.co

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PerdooFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTability
Direct57
Paraphrase33
Comparative23
Budget-constrained51
Scale-constrained01
Negative211 against Perdoo
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Perdoo and Tability were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 126 answers naming Perdoo and the 100 naming Tability. In those answers Tability took the first choice twenty-nine times and Perdoo nine.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Perdoo and Tability stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Perdoo Tability first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Perdoo on the left and Tability on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Perdoo and Tability stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Mistral SmallPerdoo, Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp

Perdoo first, Tability not the choice

4 of 14 modelsTability was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Profit.co, WorkBoard
DeepSeek V4 FlashPerdoo alternatives: Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Perdoo
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard

Tability first, Perdoo an alternative

6 of 14 modelsPerdoo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Oboard, Perdoo, Profit.co
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Muse Glimmer 30BMooncamp, Tability alternatives: HiBob, Perdoo, Profit.co

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: Mooncamp, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Tability leads by nine points.
Tability30%#1 of 17
Perdoo21%#2 of 17
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Perdoo leads at mid-market.
Perdoo24%#1 of 14
Tability22%#2 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Tability leads at enterprise.
Tability6%#5 of 13
Perdoo0%#8 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Perdoo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“review summaries mention missing features, especially around exports/user management” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perdoo – best free tier and SMB starter ... If you truly need zero spend, Perdoo’s 10-user free plan or OKR by BOJA’s no-user-limit free plan are the most commonly recommended starting points.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Perdoo is the safest budget pick for most small companies because it combines a free tier with a clear path to paid growth.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“OKRs Tool or Perdoo offer the strongest combination of features, affordability, and scalability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Tability

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Tability: Highly focused on simplicity, fast check-ins, and actionable tracking without enterprise bloat. Excellent automation and AI capabilities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“AI goal drafting/insights, async check-ins, dashboards out-of-box, agentic OKRs. Simple UI, strong Slack/Teams. Tops benchmarks (4.5-4.7/5).” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Tability ... start with Tability — it offers the best balance of simplicity, reporting power, and scalability at a fair price” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.