Goals and OKRs · October 2026 Edition
Perdoo vs WorkBoard
Five of fourteen models named Perdoo first on the direct prompt; zero named WorkBoard. Both were named by all fourteen models and Perdoo carries 44 labels and WorkBoard 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share24%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%32%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4434A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Perdoo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Profit.co was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Perdoo vs Tability · Perdoo vs Lattice · Perdoo vs OKRs Tool
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PerdooFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkBoard
Direct502 against WorkBoard
Paraphrase301 against WorkBoard
Comparative211 against WorkBoard
Budget-constrained501 against WorkBoard
Scale-constrained01
Negative201 against Perdoo · 6 against WorkBoard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Perdoo and WorkBoard were named in the same answer fifty-four times, of the 126 answers naming Perdoo and the 113 naming WorkBoard. In those answers WorkBoard took the first choice nine times and Perdoo ten.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Perdoo and WorkBoard stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Perdoo WorkBoard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Perdoo on the left and WorkBoard on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Perdoo and WorkBoard stood in it.
Perdoo first, WorkBoard an alternative
5 of 14 modelsWorkBoard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Profit.co, WorkBoard
Mistral SmallPerdoo, Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp
DeepSeek V4 FlashPerdoo alternatives: Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Perdoo
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Oboard, Perdoo, Profit.co
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: Mooncamp, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Muse Glimmer 30BMooncamp, Tability alternatives: HiBob, Perdoo, Profit.co
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Perdoo leads by twenty-one points.
Perdoo21%#2 of 17WorkBoard0%#17 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
Perdoo leads by twenty-two points.
Perdoo24%#1 of 14WorkBoard2%#8 of 14Enterprise
The order flips: WorkBoard leads at enterprise.
WorkBoard37%#1 of 13Perdoo0%#8 of 13What the models said about Perdoo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“review summaries mention missing features, especially around exports/user management” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Perdoo – best free tier and SMB starter ... If you truly need zero spend, Perdoo’s 10-user free plan or OKR by BOJA’s no-user-limit free plan are the most commonly recommended starting points.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Perdoo is the safest budget pick for most small companies because it combines a free tier with a clear path to paid growth.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“OKRs Tool or Perdoo offer the strongest combination of features, affordability, and scalability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about WorkBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise-heavy platforms (e.g., WorkBoard, Betterworks, Ally.io): Great for large orgs but criticized for: Quote-based/opaque pricing with high costs and minimums” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Overpowered for small teams / No public pricing or free tier / No free trial"; "Our users found Workboard a little difficult to use and the interface a bit slow."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“They are "closed-gate" platforms... the administrative overhead required to configure and run these tools can quickly drown out the actual value” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Workboard is considered the "gold standard" for enterprise complexity... If you are a large enterprise: Use Workboard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top tools for your scale (from 2024-2026 reviews): WorkBoard (strong enterprise reporting)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“WorkBoard is presented as a strong option for mid-market and enterprise organizations needing robust OKR operating cadence” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Perdoo vs TabilityPerdoo vs LatticePerdoo vs OKRs ToolPerdoo vs Profit.coPerdoo vs MooncampPerdoo vs BetterworksTability vs WorkBoardLattice vs WorkBoardOKRs Tool vs WorkBoardProfit.co vs WorkBoardMooncamp vs WorkBoardBetterworks vs WorkBoardAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.