Goals and OKRs · October 2026 Edition
OKRs Tool vs WorkBoard
Zero of fourteen models named OKRs Tool first on the direct prompt; zero named WorkBoard. OKRs Tool was named by twelve of the fourteen models and WorkBoard by fourteen and OKRs Tool carries 15 labels and WorkBoard 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share11%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%32%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1534A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OKRs Tool reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Perdoo was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Perdoo vs OKRs Tool · Perdoo vs WorkBoard · Tability vs OKRs Tool
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OKRs ToolFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkBoard
Direct002 against WorkBoard
Paraphrase001 against WorkBoard
Comparative011 against WorkBoard
Budget-constrained601 against WorkBoard
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against OKRs Tool · 6 against WorkBoard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OKRs Tool and WorkBoard stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
OKRs Tool WorkBoard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OKRs Tool on the left and WorkBoard on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OKRs Tool and WorkBoard stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniPerdoo alternatives: Profit.co, WorkBoard
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: Mooncamp, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Gemini 3.5 FlashTability alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Oboard, Perdoo, Profit.co
Perplexity SonarTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo
Mistral SmallPerdoo, Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp
DeepSeek V4 FlashPerdoo alternatives: Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp, Perdoo
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
MiniMax M2.5Tability alternatives: Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co
Muse Glimmer 30BMooncamp, Tability alternatives: HiBob, Perdoo, Profit.co
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
OKRs Tool leads by four points.
OKRs Tool4%#7 of 17WorkBoard0%#17 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
OKRs Tool leads by nine points.
OKRs Tool11%#4 of 14WorkBoard2%#8 of 14Enterprise
The order flips: WorkBoard leads at enterprise.
WorkBoard37%#1 of 13OKRs Tool13%#4 of 13What the models said about OKRs Tool
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“OKRs Tool (very young vendor, no certifications, built on unproven tech)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Niche or limited tools (e.g., some like OKRsTool or smaller ones): Steep learning curves, busy navigation, or superficial integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best OKR software for a company with a limited budget is OKRs Tool, which is a flat-fee OKR platform that is ideal for budget-conscious teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“OKRs Tool\u2019s flat $49/month rate is likely the best value compared to Weekdone\u2019s per-user cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“OKRs Tool or Perdoo offer the strongest combination of features, affordability, and scalability.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about WorkBoard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise-heavy platforms (e.g., WorkBoard, Betterworks, Ally.io): Great for large orgs but criticized for: Quote-based/opaque pricing with high costs and minimums” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Overpowered for small teams / No public pricing or free tier / No free trial"; "Our users found Workboard a little difficult to use and the interface a bit slow."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“They are "closed-gate" platforms... the administrative overhead required to configure and run these tools can quickly drown out the actual value” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Workboard is considered the "gold standard" for enterprise complexity... If you are a large enterprise: Use Workboard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top tools for your scale (from 2024-2026 reviews): WorkBoard (strong enterprise reporting)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“WorkBoard is presented as a strong option for mid-market and enterprise organizations needing robust OKR operating cadence” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Perdoo vs OKRs ToolPerdoo vs WorkBoardTability vs OKRs ToolTability vs WorkBoardLattice vs OKRs ToolLattice vs WorkBoardOKRs Tool vs Profit.coOKRs Tool vs MooncampOKRs Tool vs BetterworksProfit.co vs WorkBoardMooncamp vs WorkBoardBetterworks vs WorkBoardAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full goals and okrs standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.