Zero of fourteen models named Profit.co first on the direct prompt; zero named WorkBoard. Profit.co was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and WorkBoard by fourteen and both carry 34 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Profit.co and WorkBoard were named in the same answer sixty-one times, of the 118 answers naming Profit.co and the 113 naming WorkBoard. In those answers WorkBoard took the first choice sixteen times and Profit.co four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“The platform feels slow, basic operations like bulk editing goals require too many clicks, the UI is cluttered” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some reviewers note a slow, cluttered UI despite robust features.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“UI can be cluttered and slower” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Profit.co if you want a dedicated OKR platform with no user limits on the free plan” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“permanently free with unlimited OKRs and users, which makes it the strongest no-cost option” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall (Free for up to 5 users): Profit.co ... Profit.co is the strongest option.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise-heavy platforms (e.g., WorkBoard, Betterworks, Ally.io): Great for large orgs but criticized for: Quote-based/opaque pricing with high costs and minimums” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Overpowered for small teams / No public pricing or free tier / No free trial"; "Our users found Workboard a little difficult to use and the interface a bit slow."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“They are "closed-gate" platforms... the administrative overhead required to configure and run these tools can quickly drown out the actual value” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Workboard is considered the "gold standard" for enterprise complexity... If you are a large enterprise: Use Workboard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top tools for your scale (from 2024-2026 reviews): WorkBoard (strong enterprise reporting)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“WorkBoard is presented as a strong option for mid-market and enterprise organizations needing robust OKR operating cadence” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.