Org charts and org design · October 2026 Edition
Organimi vs Functionly
One of fourteen models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named Functionly. Organimi was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Functionly by eleven and Organimi carries 43 labels and Functionly 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4315A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Organimi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Pingboard was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Functionly · Organimi vs Pingboard
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OrganimiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFunctionly
Direct10
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained40
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Organimi · 1 against Functionly
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Organimi and Functionly stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Organimi Functionly first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and Functionly on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Organimi and Functionly stood in it.
Organimi first, Functionly not the choice
1 of 14 modelsFunctionly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-6 LunaOrganimi alternatives: ChartHop, OrgChart
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5OneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarOrgChart alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi
Grok 4.1 FastPingboard alternatives: Lucidchart, Organimi
Mistral SmallOrgChartHub, Pingboard alternatives: Arbor, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi
Kimi K2Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Organimi
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: BambooHR, Organimi, Pingboard
Muse Glimmer 30BPingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChartHub, Organimi
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniChartHop alternatives: OrgChart, Pingboard
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLuminal alternatives: BambooHR, BetterU, Lucidchart, Rippling
MiniMax M2.5ChartHop alternatives: OneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard, Sift
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Organimi leads by twenty-eight points.
Organimi32%#1 of 15Functionly4%#– of 15Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
What the models said about Organimi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Tools reliant on infrequent data syncs (e.g., import-only like some tiers of Organimi or Monday.com)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi has data integration issues and is not as scalable as other options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Organimi at ~$20/mo for up to 150 employees is frequently cited as the affordable dedicated option” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Organimi Premium for a typical mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Organimi is notable for being completely free for up to 25 users” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Functionly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Reason for Caution: Extremely Low Customer Support.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be ChartHop or Functionly.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Functionly as the best organizational design tool” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“consider Orgvue / Functionly if you need deeper simulation or API-first recurring change management” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
ChartHop vs OrganimiChartHop vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs CreatelyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs OneDirectoryOrganimi vs LucidchartPingboard vs FunctionlyCreately vs FunctionlyOrgChart vs FunctionlyOneDirectory vs FunctionlyFunctionly vs LucidchartAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.