Every category where a model named Functionly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	17 of 81	18%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Functionly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Functionly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“2. Functionly - for collaborative organizational design, charting, and workforce planning software.” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“such as OneDirectory, Organimi, OrgChart, Ingentis org.manager, Sift, or Functionly” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · scale prompt · alternative

“Built for org‑design teams running recurring changes with API‑based integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“want a lighter, cheaper self-serve tool → consider Functionly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Functionly (high ease but 2/10 support). Okay for small teams (<150 people), but scalability/export problems emerge.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

“Forbes rated its customer service very poorly (2/10 ease-of-support category), despite strong features.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Functionly, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Functionly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lucidchart15 of 211Not in the top three

Organimi14 of 216Not in the top three

ChartHop13 of 216Not in the top three

Creately11 of 211Not in the top three

OrgChart9 of 212Not in the top three

Pingboard9 of 211Not in the top three

Microsoft Visio7 of 210Not in the top three

Miro7 of 210Not in the top three

Orgvue6 of 211Not in the top three

OneDirectory5 of 211Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Functionly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named Functionly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

functionly.comYour site14

gartner.com13

forbes.com12

theorgchart.com12

worldmetrics.org9

g2.com8

happeo.com8

learn.g2.com8

peerdom.com8

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

Eighty-six of the 100 domain citations in answers naming Functionly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software13

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software12

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software9

functionly.com/orginometry/organizational-accountability/the-ultimate-guide-to-choosing-th8

happeo.com/blog/org-chart-software8

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software8

peerdom.com/blog/best-org-chart-software8

gitnux.org/best/organization-design-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Functionly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Functionly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at functionly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.