AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › OneDirectory vs Functionly
Org charts and org design · October 2026 Edition

OneDirectory vs Functionly

One of fourteen models named OneDirectory first on the direct prompt; zero named Functionly. OneDirectory was named by nine of the fourteen models and Functionly by eleven and OneDirectory carries 11 labels and Functionly 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

OneDirectory

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Functionly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1115A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OneDirectory reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Organimi was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs OneDirectory · ChartHop vs Functionly · Organimi vs OneDirectory

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OneDirectoryFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFunctionly
Direct10
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained20
Negative001 against OneDirectory · 1 against Functionly
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OneDirectory and Functionly stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
OneDirectory Functionly first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OneDirectory on the left and Functionly on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OneDirectory and Functionly stood in it.

OneDirectory first, Functionly not the choice

1 of 14 modelsFunctionly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5OneDirectory alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
MiniMax M2.5ChartHop alternatives: OneDirectory, OrgChart, Pingboard, Sift
Muse Glimmer 30BPingboard alternatives: ChartHop, OneDirectory, OrgChartHub, Organimi

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniChartHop alternatives: OrgChart, Pingboard
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarOrgChart alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChartHub, Organimi
Grok 4.1 FastPingboard alternatives: Lucidchart, Organimi
Mistral SmallOrgChartHub, Pingboard alternatives: Arbor, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashLuminal alternatives: BambooHR, BetterU, Lucidchart, Rippling
Kimi K2Pingboard alternatives: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Organimi
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: BambooHR, Organimi, Pingboard
GPT-6 LunaOrganimi alternatives: ChartHop, OrgChart

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Functionly leads by four points.
Functionly4%#– of 15
OneDirectory0%#– of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: OneDirectory leads at mid-market.
OneDirectory6%#6 of 13
Functionly4%#7 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
OneDirectory leads by ten points.
OneDirectory10%#4 of 15
Functionly0%#– of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about OneDirectory

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“OneDirectory: Requires Microsoft 365 as the primary data source, lighter on workforce-planning and scenario-modeling depth.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“OneDirectory is the best org chart software for mid-size and large organizations with complex structures” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory | Live HRIS sync, matrix reporting, governance. Built for mid-large orgs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“OneDirectory is recommended for mid-size and large organizations with such needs.” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Functionly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Reason for Caution: Extremely Low Customer Support.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be ChartHop or Functionly.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Functionly as the best organizational design tool” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“consider Orgvue / Functionly if you need deeper simulation or API-first recurring change management” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.