AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Interview scheduling › Greenhouse vs Ashby
Interview scheduling · October 2026 Edition

Greenhouse vs Ashby

Two of fourteen models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; one named Ashby. Greenhouse was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Ashby by eleven and Greenhouse carries 42 labels and Ashby 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Greenhouse

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

Ashby

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4218A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Greenhouse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.GoodTime was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Calendly vs Greenhouse · Calendly vs Ashby · GoodTime vs Greenhouse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interview scheduling page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GreenhouseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAshby
Direct212 against Greenhouse
Paraphrase30
Comparative001 against Greenhouse
Budget-constrained001 against Greenhouse
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Greenhouse
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Greenhouse and Ashby were named in the same answer 114 times, of the 454 answers naming Greenhouse and the 173 naming Ashby. In those answers Ashby took the first choice twelve times and Greenhouse thirty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Greenhouse and Ashby stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Greenhouse Ashby first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and Ashby on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Greenhouse and Ashby stood in it.

Greenhouse first, Ashby not the choice

2 of 14 modelsAshby was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallGreenhouse, Lever alternatives: Cal.com
Muse Glimmer 30BGreenhouse, Jobvite alternatives: GoodTime, candidate.fyi

Ashby first, Greenhouse not the choice

1 of 14 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniAshby alternatives: Calendly Sales, GoodTime, Prelude

Neither was the first choice, one was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5ModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, GoodTime, Greenhouse
Gemini 3.5 FlashModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, Calendly’s Prelude, GoodTime
Perplexity SonarGoodTime alternatives: Calendly Sales, Greenhouse, ModernLoop
Grok 4.1 FastCalendly alternatives: Chili Piper, Greenhouse, Lever
DeepSeek V4 FlashCal.com, Calendly alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Llama 4 MaverickLever alternatives: Cal.com, Greenhouse, Joveo, Workforce Now
Qwen 3.7 FlashGoodTime alternatives: Ashby, Lever
Kimi K2ModernLoop alternatives: Ashby, Calendly, GoodTime, Greenhouse, Lever
GLM 4.7 FlashXCalendly alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse, Lever
MiniMax M2.5Lever alternatives: Cal.com, Chili Piper, Greenhouse
GPT-6 LunaModernLoop alternatives: GoodTime, Greenhouse

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Ashby leads by two points.
Ashby5%#5 of 15
Greenhouse3%#7 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Greenhouse leads at mid-market.
Greenhouse8%#5 of 12
Ashby2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Greenhouse leads by seven points.
Greenhouse7%#3 of 13
Ashby0%#11 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Greenhouse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Avoid full ATS suites like Lever/Greenhouse unless free tiers suffice, as they're pricier for scale.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Greenhouse and Lever are the top recommendations due to their scalability, integration capabilities, and fit for structured recruiting processes” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Ashby

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.