Every category where a model named Assembled for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	4%	10 of 94	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	15 of 95	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Assembled yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Assembled across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels2

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Assembled is the gold standard... Choose Assembled (if integrated with Zendesk/Salesforce)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · first choice

“For Contact Centers: Consider Assembled (modern, cloud-native, good for omnichannel)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · first choice

“Assembled: Highly rated for contact centers and automated scheduling.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · first choice

“Top Pick: Assembled ... built specifically for modern support teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“When forced into old-school, voice-only legacy environments, they lack the deep telecom/ACD hardware integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce management sui · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Assembled, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Assembled was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Deputy12 of 163Not in the top three

UKG Pro9 of 161Not in the top three

Verint Workforce Management9 of 160Not in the top three

Rippling7 of 161Not in the top three

When I Work7 of 160Not in the top three

Calabrio ONE6 of 160Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors6 of 160Not in the top three

Zendesk WFM6 of 160Not in the top three

Dayforce5 of 161Not in the top three

NICE Workforce Management5 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Assembled. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 16 answers that named Assembled and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

assembled.comYour site7

gartner.com7

guideflow.com6

dialpad.com5

g2.com5

worldmetrics.org5

amplifai.com4

hropslab.com4

performancereviewssoftware.com4

rippling.com4

Forty-four of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Assembled came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/workforce-management-applications7

guideflow.com/blog/contact-center-workforce-management-software6

assembled.com/page/best-workforce-management-software5

dialpad.com/blog/best-workforce-management-software5

amplifai.com/blog/call-center-workforce-management-wfm-software4

hropslab.com/best-workforce-management-software4

performancereviewssoftware.com/blog/best-workforce-management-software-compared4

rippling.com/blog/best-workforce-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Assembled's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Assembled, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at assembled.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.