HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Atlas HXM · September 2026 Edition
Atlas · 1 category · Ranked

Atlas HXM

15Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Global payroll for enterprise buyers
Rank 30 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Atlas HXM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Global payroll and employer of recordCore HR and payroll0%30 of 6633%3under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Atlas HXM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Atlas HXM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A larger direct EOR with a strong technological platform, better suited for companies needing significant international presence.” MiniMax M2.5 · Global payroll · direct prompt · alternative
“Atlas | Direct employer model, enterprise governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global payroll · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Atlas (Exercise Caution Regarding: Rigid Deadlines & Latin American Onboarding)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Atlas HXM, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlas HXM was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Deel14 of 153Not in the top three
Remote14 of 153Not in the top three
Rippling11 of 150Not in the top three
Papaya Global10 of 151Not in the top three
G-P8 of 151Not in the top three
Oyster8 of 151Not in the top three
Multiplier5 of 150Not in the top three
Velocity Global4 of 151Not in the top three
Mercans3 of 150Not in the top three
ADP GlobalView Payroll2 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Atlas HXM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 15 answers that named Atlas HXM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com12
deel.com7
employsome.com7
teamed.global7
anywherer.com6
globaleorservices.org6
omnihr.co6
topsourceworldwide.com6
compareor.com5
hr.software5

Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Atlas HXM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Atlas HXM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Atlas HXM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Atlas 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atlas HXM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atlas HXM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at atlashxm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack