Every category where a model named Broadbean for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	5%	7 of 109	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Broadbean yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Broadbean across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase16 labels8

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you already use an ATS, Broadbean is the most reliable distribution engine to plug into it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Ranked as the overall top pick for its robust features, ease of use, and value.” Mistral Small · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Top for distribution/analytics; integrates with existing ATS but pricier setup.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“choose Broadbean if distribution breadth matters more than ATS depth” Perplexity Sonar · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Trade‑off: More specialized in multi‑board distribution and reporting; may feel less modern in UX.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Broadbean, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Broadbean was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ZipRecruiter9 of 200Not in the top three

Appcast7 of 204Not in the top three

Joveo7 of 201Not in the top three

Greenhouse6 of 200Not in the top three

Workable5 of 203Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters4 of 201Not in the top three

Idibu4 of 200Not in the top three

Indeed3 of 200Not in the top three

JazzHR3 of 200Not in the top three

JobAdder3 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Broadbean. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 20 answers that named Broadbean and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org14

ustechautomations.com13

g2.com12

jobboardly.com11

guideflow.com10

mokahr.io9

wifitalents.com9

worldmetrics.org9

ziprecruiter.com7

cxeverywhere.com6

100 of the 100 domain citations in answers naming Broadbean came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gitnux.org/best/job-distribution-software13

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/automate-best-job-posting-distribution-software-for-r12

jobboardly.com/blog/best-job-posting-software11

g2.com/discussions/what-platform-provides-automated-job-posting-distribution8

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-centralized-job-posting-tools8

guideflow.com/blog/programmatic-job-advertising-software7

cxeverywhere.com/tools/job-posting-software6

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/automated-job-posting-distribution6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Broadbean

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Broadbean; a claim can dispute any of them.

Broadbean (now part of Zhaopin) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Broadbean's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Broadbean, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at broadbean.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.