HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge

2Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge was named 1 time in Coaching platforms, where Growthspace led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market97 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	97 of 116	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These were business coaching schemes that made bogus income promises.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MOBE2 of 20Not in the top three

Circle1 of 20Not in the top three

Coach.me1 of 20Not in the top three

Digital Boost1 of 20Not in the top three

GrowthMentor1 of 20Not in the top three

Guidance / Thrive Learning1 of 20Not in the top three

Mighty Networks1 of 20Not in the top three

Noom1 of 20Not in the top three

Paperbell1 of 20Not in the top three

ProductMentor1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

consumer.ftc.gov2

ftc.gov2

reddit.com2

trustpilot.com2

uk.trustpilot.com2

au.trustpilot.com1

bbb.org1

business.cch.com1

circle.so1

coachful.co1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2026/04/how-spot-and-avoid-business-coaching-scams2

au.trustpilot.com/review/dailymentor.co1

bbb.org/file-a-complaint1

bbb.org/scamtracker1

bbb.org/scamtracker/lookupscam1

bbb.org/search1

bbb.org/us/ny/roosevelt/profile/self-improvement-coach/better-you-better-society-llc-0121-1

bbb.org/us/ri/providence/profile/nutritionist/best-life-nutrition-0021-2308001

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coaching.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.