HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Coach.me · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Coach.me

6Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Coach.me was named 6 times in Coaching platforms, where Growthspace led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market116 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In coaching platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coach.me for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	116 of 116	83%	6	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coach.me yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coach.me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“coach.me - Has reports of unauthorized charges and appears to have identity issues with similar-named companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Direct billing scam reports. ... thecoachme.com appears to be a fraudulent clone operating from Cyprus.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Trustpilot: 1.9/5 ("Poor"), multiple reports of unauthorized €49/£49 charges, identity theft by scam clones” Grok 4.1 Fast · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Trustpilot reviews indicate issues with unauthorized recurring charges and identity theft-like incidents.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coach.me, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coach.me was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Circle2 of 60Not in the top three

Noom2 of 60Not in the top three

Paperbell2 of 60Not in the top three

BetterUp1 of 60Not in the top three

CoachAccountable1 of 60Not in the top three

CoachHub1 of 60Not in the top three

Coaching Department / Apply Knowledge1 of 60Not in the top three

Coursera1 of 60Not in the top three

Guidance / Thrive Learning1 of 60Not in the top three

Kajabi1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coach.me. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Coach.me and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

consumer.ftc.gov5

coachful.co4

reddit.com4

trustpilot.com4

uk.trustpilot.com4

bbc.com3

circle.so3

bbb.org2

ca.trustpilot.com2

financialmentor.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Coach.me came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2026/04/how-spot-and-avoid-business-coaching-scams5

coachful.co/blog/best-online-coaching-platforms4

bbc.com/worklife/article/20240206-life-coaching-industry-scams3

circle.so/blog/best-coaching-platforms3

uk.trustpilot.com/review/coach.me3

ca.trustpilot.com/review/coach.me2

consumer.ftc.gov/articles/when-business-offer-or-coaching-program-scam2

financialmentor.com/financial-coaching/best-value-for-money/12-warning-signs-wrong-coachin2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Coach.me

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Coach.me; a claim can dispute any of them.

coach.me 1coach.me / thecoachme.com 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coach.me's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coach.me, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coachme.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.