HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Eddy · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Eddy

12Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Eddy was named 3 times in HRIS and HCM platforms and 1 other category, where Rippling led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hris and hcm platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Eddy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
HRIS and HCM platformsCore HR and payroll0%18 of 460%2under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22%
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%37 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eddy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eddy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“with Eddy and Gusto as strong alternatives” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee onboarding · budget prompt · alternative
“Eddy – Best for Hourly/Shift‑Based Teams” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HRIS and HCM platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eddy, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eddy was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gusto9 of 121Not in the top three
BambooHR7 of 121Not in the top three
Zoho People6 of 125Not in the top three
Rippling6 of 120Not in the top three
Homebase5 of 120Not in the top three
Keka3 of 120Not in the top three
TimeClock Plus3 of 120Not in the top three
greytHR3 of 120Not in the top three
Click Boarding2 of 120Not in the top three
Deel2 of 120Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eddy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Eddy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com9
fitsmallbusiness.com7
hrcloud.com6
effy.ai4
firsthr.app4
gartner.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
selectsoftwarereviews.com4
technologyadvice.com4
bigideasdb.com3

Forty-nine of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Eddy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Eddy

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Eddy; a claim can dispute any of them.
Eddy HR 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eddy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eddy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eddy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.